News:

[07-11-2024] Various forum updates made.

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: maximum total size 8.00 MB, maximum individual size 2.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:

How many engines are on a Lockheed L-1011?:
How many engines are on a C-17 Globemaster III?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by sungoban
 - June 02, 2010, 01:51:36 AM
Thanks Duy.  My pics look slightly soft to me but maybe I'm expecting too much.  I'm still trying to get over the sticker shock of the lens.  My wife's still shakes her head when I tell her the lens was 1.5X the cost of the camera. 

I'll take some pics @ 100, 200... 400mm w/ a tripod and email them to you.  What's the best way to send RAW files that are about 21 MB large?
Posted by Dragonskiss
 - June 01, 2010, 07:27:02 PM
Whether or not an image is "soft" is somewhat subjective to each individual's eye; but I'll chime in. Inherently, this lens is known to be soft at 400mm. However, I've had issues with it throughout the entire focal range. Usually, a lens performs at its sharpest 2 stops down from its widest aperture. In this case, on the tele end, it being f/5.6, the lens should theoretically be at its sharpest at f/11. I've done a variety of controlled tests (tripod, manual focus, etc.) with results that leave something to be desired. I'd be more than glad to take a look at some of the results you get with your copy. Send me a full resolution JPEG/RAW, and if possible, take the image with the body on a tripod with the image stabilization off. Since Amazon is so generous with their return policy, you may want to consider returning the lens and hope for the best on your next copy. Unfortunately, time was not on my side when I had the opportunity to return it, and it may actually be going to the service center in Irvine this week. Also, of note, set your picture style to "Neutral", as this will not add any in-camera sharpening. Hope that helps!
Posted by Diegos Aviacion
 - June 01, 2010, 02:35:41 PM
Maybe it's not the lens! Can be the body!  ;)
Posted by phantomphan1974
 - June 01, 2010, 02:02:26 PM
Quote from: sungoban on June 01, 2010, 01:46:34 PM
@chilibean - I went to Westchester bridge for a little while on Memorial Day and caught the green Cathay Pacific. My pics aren't nearly as sharp as code20 although the heat haze was awful and bluntly put, he's a much better photographer.  I'd just like a foolproof way to confirm it's the lens and not me.

@phantom - I'd probably just exchange the lens unless you think a service return is a better idea. I just received it from amazon on Friday. 
Maybe if you feel that it is soft and not a hassle to return.  Dragonskiss is an Amazon shopper as well and had the same issues.  Like I said contact him, would be a good idea.  Good luck!
Posted by sungoban
 - June 01, 2010, 01:46:34 PM
@chilibean - I went to Westchester bridge for a little while on Memorial Day and caught the green Cathay Pacific. My pics aren't nearly as sharp as code20 although the heat haze was awful and bluntly put, he's a much better photographer.  I'd just like a foolproof way to confirm it's the lens and not me.

@phantom - I'd probably just exchange the lens unless you think a service return is a better idea. I just received it from amazon on Friday. 
Posted by phantomphan1974
 - May 31, 2010, 03:38:05 PM
Duy was having a similar issue.  Contact him.  Service center may be your answer.
Posted by CHILIBEAN
 - May 31, 2010, 04:57:01 AM
this looks as if it was the weather..i have this lens and its pretty good one...take a look at the lax thread and look at code20photos he also uses a 100-400mm L lens
Posted by sungoban
 - May 31, 2010, 01:28:47 AM
I just bought a brand new 100-400mm L lens this Friday and I'm trying to decide whether the lens is soft @ 400mm or not.  Or whether the poor images are caused by heat haze, low lighting, etc.  Basically, trying to figure out if I should keep it or exchange it.

I met someone from apsocal.com w/ an 100-400mm lens (sorry, I didn't get the name) earlier today @ Imperial Hill, who suggested that I take a picture of a street sign to judge this.  So I took a pic of the Sheldon & Imperial Ave. sign @ 400mm across the street from the Hill.

I'm pretty new @ photography so I'd value other people's opinions.  Is this a "soft" image?