News:

[07-11-2024] Various forum updates made.

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: maximum total size 8.00 MB, maximum individual size 2.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:

How many engines are on a Lockheed L-1011?:
How many engines are on a U-2 Spy Plane?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Code20photog
 - November 16, 2009, 10:12:36 AM
You don't need runways to land flying saucers....  8)
Posted by NikonGuy
 - August 27, 2008, 09:07:15 PM
scary...  ::)
Posted by Midnight Mover
 - August 27, 2008, 06:59:52 PM
Government 8)
Posted by NikonGuy
 - August 27, 2008, 03:13:44 AM
Hmmm like area 51...   <laughing>
Posted by Josh
 - January 02, 2008, 04:04:44 PM
Lockheed's Helendale Radar Cross Section (RCS) Range has an active runway, so it kinda counts. <laughing> I've never been able to find an FAA ident for the airport there though.

The panorama is of the RCS facilities, those hangars don't house the planes that fly in, there's no taxiway to them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar_cross_section